A tale of two whys
February 19th, 2010Four years ago, the OpenOffice.org Marketing Project put together some web pages to present the case for using OpenOffice.org, which we called Why OpenOffice.org? It’s a sign of the increasing level of worry in Microsoft that they have now produced their own Why Microsoft? pages.
The recent launch of OpenOffice.org 3.2 ahead of MS-Office has scored a marketing point in the race to be “the 2010 Office Suite”. This regular flow of free upgrades from OpenOffice.org contrasts with the disruptive “let’s rearrange all the tables on the Titanic” upgrades every few years from its pricey rival. With their own surveys showing that OpenOffice.org has broken the key 20% market share figure in several key markets, Microsoft Europe are under particular pressure. Maybe they need to translate their Why pages into German, French, Italian, Spanish, etc as soon as possible

February 19th, 2010 at 5:44 pm
The claim by a “proficient” MS Office user that it took “several hours … a week for a month” gave me a good laugh.
You should be quoting that. According to a Microsoft endorsed comment a proficient MS Office user can convert to OOo with around 10 hours of learning. That learning does not require formal “training” so is low cost and no obstacle at all to conversion.
February 20th, 2010 at 8:53 am
I’d be interested in a link to that quote. Our experience is that 10 hours is way too high.
John
February 20th, 2010 at 10:14 pm
You can see it by following the reference to the “Why Microsoft” link above. It is in one of the boxes with quotes from MS friendlies.